Render dimensions

alanthompson9187

Hi All, if i want to make a poster at A0 size 14043 x 9933 in pixels, would have to render out at this size ? or can you renedr at a smaller dimmension and then fit to the art work A0 work board in say Photoshop ? Thanks.

alanthompson9187

I forgot to add to that , the main figure would be the main focus of the art work and take up most of the space on the poster, Thanks.

Leana

If you want a sharp detailled result then it's better to render at the intended size, if you render smaller and redimension it there's a risk it will become pixelated and/or blurry when expanded.

nicstt

That size would take a lot of VRAM; at that size, I'd be tempted to look for a provider that allows rendering.

alanthompson9187

Thanks Guys, nicstt , what is  provider that allows rendering.? . 

Thakt it thats outsourcing some one who will do the render ?, wouldn't know whewre to start with that .

Seven193

Can't you just split the render into 4 parts, render each one separately, and then stitch them together?

If spot rendering saves memory, then I would try that.

kenshaw011267

You can't render at those dimensions in DS.

Your options are to split the scene and spot render or to render at a lower size and upsample, which won't be as sharp.

TheKD

https://www.daz3d.com/forums/discussion/209136/render-with-ultra-high-resolution/p1
Check this thread.
 

TesseractSpace

kenshaw011267 said:

You can't render at those dimensions in DS.

Your options are to split the scene and spot render or to render at a lower size and upsample, which won't be as sharp.

Gonna quote Richard Haseltine from the other thread on the subject:

"Is taxing for the system to render large images" is not the same as "not designed for large images".

you can turn off the limit like with most parameters and render as big as your system can handle. But with closeups there's a point where the textures aren't big enough to provide the detail needed.