I admit, my monitor was more expensive from Amazon. But it was a end of year company bonus type of thing. It only came in Amazon credit. This was the best monitor I could get for the credit.
I was also sold on the Samsung name as I haven't had any issues with my other Samsung products. The picture in picture and multiple inputs were very important for what I needed.
I have the Samsung side by side with a 32 inch Sceptre and that makes the Samsung look even better. I havem't had an LG, so can't give comments on that.
I have never heard of a "4K" PC monitor, other than those "Thunder"-something ones that required a thick cable.
I would be interested to hear about comparisons of the two types, side by side.
Occasionally, I see screens in a store like Staples that I don't like, eg. when I look at them "it's clear" that's not the one for me, sort of thing. Other than that the only thing I can say is that the "Retina" ones generally seem better... for a lot more money.
Related: I have never looked at a "Cintiq" screen. Have those kept up with the technology, I wonder.
As far as I remember, 4k computer monitors are often referred to as UHD. But are essentially the same. There may be some technical differences or I may have the term wrong.
Dell hasn't been something I've recommended in a while. The past ten years or so their support has gone signiicantly down. I don't know about the hardware as a result. I used to swear by Dell though.
I used this for a while and it was nice, but I shelved it and brought my LG 3440 x 1440 ultra-wide back into play. I just didn't like how much juice the 4k monitor required with the Daz viewport, particularly because I use Iray preview a lot. Bigger viewport = more juice needed for the Iray preview. Also, the ultra-wide is just so damn beauteous to game on. Once you go ultra-wide for gaming, you won't ever want to go back. I think for practically purposes, 2k is the sweet spot.
In terms of color accuracy, I make sure to go with anything that covers or is at least 99% coverage of the sRGB gamut. You can find monitors that will give specs on the AdobeRGB gamut, but I don't need screen to print accuracy anymore and everything on the web uses sRGB. If it doesn't tell you minimum of 99% coverage of the sRGB gamut, then I wouldn't waste your time. Also, I'd make sure to pick up an IPS panel to avoid color/contrast wonkification on viewing angles. The bigger the monitor, the more this matters. I initially bought a cheaper 4k model when I was shopping that wasn't an IPS panel (I think it was a TN panel) and then had to return it because things would literally turn color on me as I would watch them scroll from the top to the bottom of the screen. That's no deal for me.
Comments
I picked up this one in December: Samsung 32" UJ590 UHD Monitor
https://www.samsung.com/us/computing/monitors/uhd-and-wqhd/32-uj590-uhd-monitor-lu32j590uqnxza/
I have been very happy with it. Decent number inputs. Clear screen. Easy to access on screen menu. Picture in picture option.
DELETE
I admit, my monitor was more expensive from Amazon. But it was a end of year company bonus type of thing. It only came in Amazon credit. This was the best monitor I could get for the credit.
I was also sold on the Samsung name as I haven't had any issues with my other Samsung products. The picture in picture and multiple inputs were very important for what I needed.
I have the Samsung side by side with a 32 inch Sceptre and that makes the Samsung look even better. I havem't had an LG, so can't give comments on that.
DELETE
I have never heard of a "4K" PC monitor, other than those "Thunder"-something ones that required a thick cable.
I would be interested to hear about comparisons of the two types, side by side.
Occasionally, I see screens in a store like Staples that I don't like, eg. when I look at them "it's clear" that's not the one for me, sort of thing. Other than that the only thing I can say is that the "Retina" ones generally seem better... for a lot more money.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b0283/b0283c104cbb5d5e02918d4d78c75eee3cf810f4" alt="frown frown"
Related: I have never looked at a "Cintiq" screen. Have those kept up with the technology, I wonder.
As far as I remember, 4k computer monitors are often referred to as UHD. But are essentially the same. There may be some technical differences or I may have the term wrong.
Dell hasn't been something I've recommended in a while. The past ten years or so their support has gone signiicantly down. I don't know about the hardware as a result. I used to swear by Dell though.
I used this for a while and it was nice, but I shelved it and brought my LG 3440 x 1440 ultra-wide back into play. I just didn't like how much juice the 4k monitor required with the Daz viewport, particularly because I use Iray preview a lot. Bigger viewport = more juice needed for the Iray preview. Also, the ultra-wide is just so damn beauteous to game on. Once you go ultra-wide for gaming, you won't ever want to go back. I think for practically purposes, 2k is the sweet spot.
In terms of color accuracy, I make sure to go with anything that covers or is at least 99% coverage of the sRGB gamut. You can find monitors that will give specs on the AdobeRGB gamut, but I don't need screen to print accuracy anymore and everything on the web uses sRGB. If it doesn't tell you minimum of 99% coverage of the sRGB gamut, then I wouldn't waste your time. Also, I'd make sure to pick up an IPS panel to avoid color/contrast wonkification on viewing angles. The bigger the monitor, the more this matters. I initially bought a cheaper 4k model when I was shopping that wasn't an IPS panel (I think it was a TN panel) and then had to return it because things would literally turn color on me as I would watch them scroll from the top to the bottom of the screen. That's no deal for me.
DELETE
LED Light Emitting Diode. LCD Liquid Crystal Display. Not at all the same.