Loading...
> >

help? Where is Daz Studio 4.9??

SalashinSalashin Posts: 14
in Daz Studio Discussion

My DIM only shows Daz Studio 4.20  I haven't used the software in years so I am very confused because everything is tagged 4.5+ and I have no idea where to get it?

Comments

  • GordigGordig Posts: 10,052

    4.9 is an old version, and Daz doesn't make those available as a matter of course. You can still install and use it if you happen to still have an installer. Is there a particular reason you need 4.9?

  • PerttiAPerttiA Posts: 10,024

    Your version is four point twenty... Twenty is bigger number than five or nine.

  • SalashinSalashin Posts: 14

    Oh ok. I feel stupid. For whatever reason I saw it as 4.2 vs 4.9.  Not as 4.20!  I'm a numpty lol. Thank you for clarifying.  :)

  • LeanaLeana Posts: 11,692

    You probably read the version number as a single decimal number, while it's actuall 2 different numbers separated by a dot: major version number (4) and minor version number (20).

    A lot of people made the same mistake, if that can comfort you ;)

  • tfistfis Posts: 129

    Salashin said:

    Oh ok. I feel stupid. For whatever reason I saw it as 4.2 vs 4.9.  Not as 4.20!  I'm a numpty lol. Thank you for clarifying.  :)

     

    No need to feel stupid. Normally after 4.9 follows 5.0., otherwise it should be written 4.09.

  • Richard HaseltineRichard Haseltine Posts: 100,804

    Strictly therea re four numbers eparated by full-stops - 4.20.0.17 for the current general release, for example.

  • tfistfis Posts: 129

    Richard Haseltine said:

    Strictly therea re four numbers eparated by full-stops - 4.20.0.17 for the current general release, for example.

    This way it makes sense.

  • nicsttnicstt Posts: 11,715

    tfis said:

    Salashin said:

    Oh ok. I feel stupid. For whatever reason I saw it as 4.2 vs 4.9.  Not as 4.20!  I'm a numpty lol. Thank you for clarifying.  :)

     

    No need to feel stupid. Normally after 4.9 follows 5.0., otherwise it should be written 4.09.

    Depends what you mean by normal.

    When talking about normal in relation to software versions, then that is NOT normal - merely coincidence.

  • alan bard newcomeralan bard newcomer Posts: 2,174

    not surprising since I remember having to re-number a set of 12 hdrs to 01,02 etc in order to keep 11 and 12 from coming up in front of the daz listing. 
    and of course we went from V1 2 3 V4 to G then G2, G3 and then G8 and now G8.1
     

     

  • Richard HaseltineRichard Haseltine Posts: 100,804

    alan bard newcomer said:

    not surprising since I remember having to re-number a set of 12 hdrs to 01,02 etc in order to keep 11 and 12 from coming up in front of the daz listing. 

    That is up to the PA who made the set

    and of course we went from V1 2 3 V4 to G then G2, G3 and then G8 and now G8.1

    Well, Genesis was a separate series using a separate system so they restarted the numbering fro that, and then having the Victoria etc. numbers not match the Genesis number was confusing so they rebased.

    In any event, the version numbering system for Daz Studio is pretty normal (even the lack of leading zeroes), not something that needs comment.

Sign In or Register to comment.