GTX970 - TITAN X speed test rendering for IRAY
![JPiat](https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/de6df142db3a9567b2db25cadb6c8649?&r=pg&s=100&d=https%3A%2F%2Fvanillicon.com%2Fde6df142db3a9567b2db25cadb6c8649_100.png)
My config i7 2600k + 32 Go + PCI express 2.0 motherboard. MSI GTX970 (4 Go, 1664 Cuda) main GPU, MSI TITAN X (12Go, 3072 Cuda) secondary GPU
Test 1: scene : Victoria 6 + Skyler hair : Iray material for both. Environment map + headlamp. The scene weight is 2 Go. Render Time 1 minute. OptiX prim ON
CPU : 85 iteration.
GTX 970 : 700 iterations
Titan X : 1067 Iterations
GTX970 + Titan X : 1460 iterations
CPU + GTX970 + Titan X : 1136 iterations.
Test 2 : Scene test : Pursuit on my gallerie. The scene weight is 5 Go, impossible to render with the GTX970. Firefly + Bloom + Noise filter, quality 2. Render time 3 minutes. OptiX prim ON
Titan X : 262 iterations
GTX970 + Titan X : 348 iterations but the memory usage is absurd : 4Go on the GTX, 8 GO on the Titan X.
Conclusion.
The CPU is useless. The best option is to use 2 GPU. the number of CUDA is important but the gain is not linear
My intention was to use the GTX for the viewport and the Titan X for rendering.
Comments
Did you happen to save those renders so we can see them for comparison?
I almost always get better results with just my render card selected for rendering; if selecting anything else ever has made a difference, then it was very small positive but potentially more detrimental. It also increases heat and noise another negative for me. I like quiet. :)
OptiX seems pointless at best.
Anyone actually know what it is supposed to do?
None are finished... The idea is to compare the number of iterations after the same period of time using different configuration.
The default setting 5 000 iterations is not that bad. I use 18 000 iterations on most of my render.