Loading...
> >

New Information of DAZ Product Page Is A Bit Confusing - SOLVED

hjakehjake Posts: 895
edited November 2023 in The Commons

The new MK204 looks very nice however the product information is a bit confusing.  See attached image.

Is it DAZ Studio compliant? Is it Blender compliant? Do we need a bridge? Will these questions never end?

Enquiring minds want to know?!?

 

 

2023-11-12_021349.jpg
2449 x 1517 - 1M
Post edited by hjake on

Comments

  • WendyLuvsCatzWendyLuvsCatz Posts: 38,219

    it has duf files so definitely D|S

    just an error

  • DartanbeckDartanbeck Posts: 21,570

    So... did petipet and Mely3D and Xivon get together and form "Absolute Studios" or something?

  • felisfelis Posts: 4,338

    Dartanbeck said:

    So... did petipet and Mely3D and Xivon get together and form "Absolute Studios" or something?

    It is Daz Original Anonymious. 

  • DartanbeckDartanbeck Posts: 21,570

    felis said:

    Dartanbeck said:

    So... did petipet and Mely3D and Xivon get together and form "Absolute Studios" or something?

    It is Daz Original Anonymious. 

    Really? That makes sense now. 

  • GordigGordig Posts: 10,058

    The "file format" only appears when a product includes native file formats for other programs. So in addition to the DS files, this one should also include a .blend file.

  • hjakehjake Posts: 895
    edited November 2023

    Thanks everyone. I had not noticed it before and when I did a Google search of the DAZ Forum I could not find anyone else mentioning this issue. Also it was 2am here when I posted. A little scrolling down to the description would have clarified things. angry

    I think adding DAZ Studio to the File Format list would be better. Explicit is usually better than implicit.

    I am a devout believer in The Zen of Python

    Beautiful is better than ugly.
    Explicit is better than implicit.
    Simple is better than complex.
    Complex is better than complicated.
    Flat is better than nested.
    Sparse is better than dense.
    Readability counts.
    Special cases aren't special enough to break the rules.
    Although practicality beats purity.
    Errors should never pass silently.
    Unless explicitly silenced.
    In the face of ambiguity, refuse the temptation to guess.
    There should be one-- and preferably only one --obvious way to do it.
    Although that way may not be obvious at first unless you're Dutch.
    Now is better than never.
    Although never is often better than *right* now.
    If the implementation is hard to explain, it's a bad idea.
    If the implementation is easy to explain, it may be a good idea.
    Namespaces are one honking great idea -- let's do more of those!

    source: https://towardsdatascience.com/the-zen-of-python-a-guide-to-pythons-design-principles-93f3f76d088a

     

    Post edited by hjake on
  • columbinecolumbine Posts: 455

    felis said:

    Dartanbeck said:

    So... did petipet and Mely3D and Xivon get together and form "Absolute Studios" or something?

    It is Daz Original Anonymious. 

    Would fave post if had fave button.

    For those who want to keep score, as of 12 Nov: Sci-Fi Octopus and MK204 are Mely; Xivon didn't even remove his XI from the RV; Polaris Props are Petipet; and I believe the Agora is a Merlin holdover but won't absolutely swear to that last part.

    (I'm not knocking these kits, mods; they're pretty good kits, especially for the price, and I've bought three of five. But I really would prefer to always have things labelled as being by the actual people they're by. I recognize I am not likely to get my wish.)

Sign In or Register to comment.