Adding to Cart…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0979/d0979e4013311cd37b04cab725c86d086bb52de5" alt=""
Licensing Agreement | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | EULA
© 2025 Daz Productions Inc. All Rights Reserved.You currently have no notifications.
Licensing Agreement | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | EULA
© 2025 Daz Productions Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Comments
Certainly realistic..
IMO is really doesn't matter how detailed/realistic looking the character is if the lighting sucks
But my vote for character's (not all 2020 releases, soz) who look most like real life hoomans , f that's what we're talking:
- Hagar by CarbonCrow;
- Ensley, Malika, Noemi, Nadya and Lyra are my fav from Bluejaunte;
- Asher, Romina, and Gila by Mousso (and Albany is probably my fav for skin textures!)
- Phoe by Spow (lol that rhymes);
- Sitric and Allegra by Redzstudio;
- Eden and Caitlin by Vyktohria;
- Ainara by Akasha and Anain;
- Underbelly by Jonny Rampant;
- Leland, Ester... yeah k pretty much EVERYTHING by Saiyaness;
- Evangeliya, Eiluned, and Livilla by isourcetextures for realistically imperfect skin;
- Dain, Floyd, Leroy, Dasan , Vladimir and CJ, Babina, Mabel, Kayo, Alawa and Aubrey from Daz.
Maddelirium at Rendo is very good with characters, Monet and Carley being good examples.
I know that @lyoness works really hard at trying to make interesting and realistic characters. I recommend you check her out.
I do ;) LY Zara is the base for most of my jungle girls.
@alienarea , then you really need to check Nyala. She is my newest dark skinned girl.
O.O Are you implying you know lyoness personally? Gonna have to press j for doubt here, lyoness is totally elusive.
I'm also a fan of Maddelirium's work.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/12663/12663c0fabbb7aa932864298246eedbbd58622d1" alt="yes yes"
The thread isn't about what is real or what is required to be realistic, only what you feel is the most realistic.
We've asked for guidelines from the OP, but without them all we can do is post what we think are - and ideally (?) what made us feel it was appropriate.
Well we know the original post was asking about characters. They did not ask for backgrounds or lighting or general trash talking, I'm looking at the preview while waiting for IRAY to finish rendering with one of my fruity fake poorly lit high school drama queen backgrounds. And based on that, I am convinced Lyoness's Nyala should be added to the list of most realistic G8 characters.
And we appreciate it. :) Here's some Marika love.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e3e2/0e3e2475d9f4c16b142de694a4ed6ddb0450fe76" alt="heart heart"
Already have her. Plus a few more. ;)
I always adapt to my personal tastest, whatever I have purchased. I personally find that is what makes Daz so exciting.
For example (I am a painter) I often prefer the legs less long, and the head too small. 7 1/2 heads, or 8 for standardized figures is much better.
But my personal favourites for females are Mousso and Bluejaunte. I also have some Lyoness creations, which are also very good.
What I don't like are the stores where everyone is clearly a clone of all the others.
But the most realistic figures? Open yer renders in Photoshop and start working!
my personal opinion of course.
and Saiyaness' Uchenna for G3 is indeed very realistic.
https://www.daz3d.com/catalogsearch/result/?q=bluejaunte
https://www.daz3d.com/emma-for-genesis-3--8-female
https://www.daz3d.com/carly-hd-for-genesis-8-female
https://www.daz3d.com/margot-for-victoria-8
https://www.daz3d.com/hagar-for-genesis-8-female
https://www.daz3d.com/malin-for-jenni-8
https://www.daz3d.com/kim-seohyun-for-genesis-8-female
Not for the same reasons.
Some i like the skin, some the shape and some both. But these are my favorites in terms of realism.
Thanks, Nylongirl. I got Nyarai (with the hair) and this is indeed a use-as-is character for some Sumerian myth or so.
Oh, wow, thank you. How did I not notice this gem? That is what I call a real feminine figure. Well done.
Wishlisted.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e3e2/0e3e2475d9f4c16b142de694a4ed6ddb0450fe76" alt="heart heart"
I completely agree with this definition. A characters form and skin should look real regardless of the lighting conditions and all the 'lighting' in the world can't make fake looking/shaped characters look more real.... Garbage In/ Garbage Out.. Thanks for laying it out...
I'd love to see realistic and beautiful but achieving a level of details is critical.. otherwise it makes no sense to give names to generic characters that can simply be reshaped.
Does anyone know if Evangeliya from iSourceTextures has Fibermesh Eyebrows? It says so in the description, but I cannot find them in the file list. In the promos they look like part of the texture.
No idea, sorry.
https://www.daz3d.com/tatiana-hd-and-expression-for-genesis-8-female
Going to add Bleujaunt's latest to the list; the promos look realistic, and although there are a couple that it's easy to quickly flag them as 3D, it's the fault of other aspects than shape and texturing.
https://www.daz3d.com/media/catalog/product/cache/1/image/9df78eab33525d08d6e5fb8d27136e95/t/a/tatiana-hd-and-expressions-for-genesis-8-female-16-daz3d.jpg
Looking at this image for example: the buttock doesn't react to being sat on the chair; the hair looks odd - in a lot of the renders - too sharp in places, just not right.
It says lashes, not brows. /People/Genesis 8 Female/Characters/Evangeliya/Evangeliya Fibermesh Lashes.duf according to the File list in the read me http://docs.daz3d.com/doku.php/public/read_me/index/69745/file_list
From the details:
"Boasting many feature options, plus Fibermesh Eyebrows and Lashes, Evangeliya HD is ready for all occasions. Get her for your next render!"
Unless they are part of the same mesh as the lashes that looks like an error.
Just my once-per-year reminder that what is 'real' is actually made up (as in make-up).
Thank you, Jamie Lee.
Doesn't look like the makeup artist had a very difficult job then.
I probably should have said 'made-up and touched-up,' but I agree that Jamie Lee Curtis is and always has been extremely attractive.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e3e2/0e3e2475d9f4c16b142de694a4ed6ddb0450fe76" alt="heart heart"
That movie was released in 1988. Jamie posed without makeup in 2002. That is a 14 year gap in time, she was in her mid 40's by that point, and anybody is going to look radically different after 14 years. A more accurate representation of this would be to post a 2002 picture of her in movie makeup, like the article from 2002 does. So how about...Freaky Friday, LOL.
Well, I still look exactly like I did 14 years ago (turns head and coughs).data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e20e/3e20e0e254a7a7f46e9c7048c4ca524ef28d689b" alt="laugh laugh"