Adding to Cart…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0979/d0979e4013311cd37b04cab725c86d086bb52de5" alt=""
Licensing Agreement | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | EULA
© 2025 Daz Productions Inc. All Rights Reserved.You currently have no notifications.
Licensing Agreement | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | EULA
© 2025 Daz Productions Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Comments
Other's experience may vary, but based upon my experience, I have been denied a refund citing those refund policies, even for what I consider a genuine cause such as inaccurate invoicing.
I don't think so. Considering that if someone had the intention of accessing a product non-legitimately, there are more convenient means than to go through the hassles of ordering and then claiming a refund.
I think it's great you offer help to those who purchase your products, and thank you so much for coming to this thread and stating this.
Thanks to you for your support, and we also want to say thank you to all our DAZ customers for their constant support for so many years. Without them, we couldn't have worked on this so long. All that we can do to help them is just giving back what they have given us.
Thank you again guys, heartly.
Having spoken with quite a few PAs on the matter of piracy, I get the impression that at least one or two of the refunds in a product's first few days are probably the way many assets get on the pirate sites in the first place.
Then those user/accounts should be easy to track based on those patterns given the limited number of purchases that happen with introductory sales. Hypothetically, such users wouldn't be using the same account for a long time and this refund policy would have no effect on discouraging that practice if such users are frequently switching accounts.
Moreover, such corner cases should not be the basis of defining a global refund policy and forcing it down on users who have a genuine case for asking for a refund.