Adding to Cart…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0979/d0979e4013311cd37b04cab725c86d086bb52de5" alt=""
Licensing Agreement | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | EULA
© 2025 Daz Productions Inc. All Rights Reserved.You currently have no notifications.
Licensing Agreement | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | EULA
© 2025 Daz Productions Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Comments
I was a feature film union set decorator and 360' of almost every room was camera ready. It was the same with TV series, other than sitcoms because one side of the set was open to the audience. I don't remember any movie where the art directer said "just decorate a corner". Maybe in 1930's Hollywood studios they just built corners.
Edit: I take that back. You're right. On scenes that rely on special effects, often only a fragment of the set is constructed. Also on TV commercials, sets are built to be viewed from a limited number of angles, so a corner may be all that is put together. In movies, when they turn the camera around to show the point of view from another character, there has to be a complete room behind them.
I guess then most here intend rendering moviesdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d370/8d3709a976dc10db330dbc3addf888866b950cfd" alt="cheeky cheeky"
I think, here, that those who are doing comic books, probably need 360' interiors because the same interiors are used over and over again and you can't keep showing the same angle of the room, also, the style of a lot of comic books use some of the same conventions as movies where you change the point-of-view to match a character's point of view, which means turning the camera around.
Alfred Hitchcock was notorious for only having a limited amount of a room constructed so his producer couldn't force him to film shots from angles other than those on Hitchcock's own storyboards.
You're right, lots of renders only need a corner or a portion of a room.
Graphic novels also need shots from quite a lot angles.
LOL I would struggle to render all this in DAZ studio and most of it is separate sets even in other softwares
but then I do admittedly have a crappy rigdata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d370/8d3709a976dc10db330dbc3addf888866b950cfd" alt="cheeky cheeky"
I like enclosed rooms only because of the way the light bounces more realistically.
A lot of older Poser sets look pretty amazing when converted to Iray, especially when you take the time to tweak them a little. I rendently used Jack Tomalin's now ancient (in DAZ terms) Redhouse Sweet shop for a Victorian interior and it looked amazing once I replaced the floor with Iray wood shader.
All that said, I agree that it's a pain, and I'm not really sure which frustrates me more... getting an elaborate exterior that has no interior, or getting an intricate interior that has no matching exterior.
Maybe I'm the odd man out, but I never had a problem changing older sets that I love (ie Faveral's and Stonemason's) over to Iray. I did it with Stoney's Abandoned Warehouse and Faveral's Opus Magnum. Took me hours for each one. I enjoy that kinda thing tho. LOL
Not all of us render movies or just do single renders.. My main use for Daz Studio is rendering panels for comics that I create..
while I understand being someone who actually uses completely furnished albeit lower poly than most DAZ studio users would be happy with sets for videos, I do have to wonder what sort of computers you all own that can load fully funished interiors and exteriors whether you render that other room or not, something modular like Strangefate and Rogey make I could understand.
Their European apartment being a good example like JTs old dreamhome where you can just load separate fully funished rooms in situ as you need them.
Maybe they could do a Victorian Mansion next.
I would buy it too BTW, wasn't saying I didn't want what everyone else is asking for just making unwanted suggestions of how one can work around it in the meantimedata:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3e67f/3e67fc04653accf7aafb4aebdfa90df1fb40a291" alt="devil devil"
I have a MacBook Pro. You don't need an expensive computer. You can write a best seller with a pencil. It's not what you have that matters, it's what you do with what you have that matters.
I am running a I7 8700k with a 1070ti, so I have to make a lot of sacrifices when building scenes with iRay.. 3DL on the other hand I have no such problems, getting lighting right is the main hassle there..
I have a 4 core Intel laptop with a 970m gfx card with 6 gigs and 16 gigs of ram. It can render most things, tho not always on the gfx card ;). I also have an HP Z620 with 64 gigs of ram, 2-8 core Xeons and a 980ti with 6 gigs. It can render most things, tho not always on the gfx card. LOL Neither machine is anything spectacular.
Ryzen 3 980ti for iray
and an
i7 4 core no graphics card my prefered Carrara native and 3Delight rig
but yeah a fully furnished mansion would absolutely have to be modular for me
My problem with this product is that even though I installed it with DIM, it doesn't show up in smart content. Super annoying. I'll try to reinstall usin Content Wizard.
This isn't a general thread about Blackwood manor, assuming that is the product you mean. For what it's worth, I installed through Connect and it is in Smart Content - do your files have content type tags (e.g. Set on the complete presets)? If not it may be that the metadata was not written - for example, of you close DS and start DIM the timing of events can lead to PostgreSQL not running during the install - so it may be worth uninstalling and reinstalling. If the issue does persist please report it to support.
I've always felt that ther execution of DAZ's smart content made it a bit of an oxymoron and, given that a huge portion of the products that I own don't work with it anyway, gave up on it years ago.