Adding to Cart…
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d0979/d0979e4013311cd37b04cab725c86d086bb52de5" alt=""
Licensing Agreement | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | EULA
© 2025 Daz Productions Inc. All Rights Reserved.You currently have no notifications.
Licensing Agreement | Terms of Service | Privacy Policy | EULA
© 2025 Daz Productions Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Comments
I understand... I always take a dreep breath when I read your posts, understanding you speak English better than I speak your native tongue... which is not at all.
And I have not disappeared. I still can't stand the overblown lights, though I sometimes bow and accept them if I don't feel like re-balancing everything.
+1, sometimes you still gotta use tricks from film... it is, after all, the metaphor we are working in.. photorealistic.
Don't say I don't love you special... I've thrown together a quicky HDRI that should serve you reasonably well. https://www.dropbox.com/s/t4ew11o9cojepmh/Thrown Together hdri.zip?dl=0 To use it just go to render settings/ environment and substitute it for what ever environment map you have in there. I don't think it is too bright for seam checking but if you think so you can always decease (or increase for that matter) the light levels. You will note that the old settings for skin are very dark even in this light level. The new ones (I just put the ones I had done for arabella over nina so it is admittedly sloppy) are much lighter and more realistic.
Velvet is in the OmniShader, which I THINK everyone has access to, not a purchased whatever.
I've seen fabric effects with Omnishader that actually surpass the realism of Iray. But then everything else, not so much.
Thanks!!!! Yea, hinting at the other thing, lol. keeping the skin setting brightness consistent with other stuff, lol. So that is a play between light settings and camera settings. So, if I keep the light settings on default, what ballpark tone mapping settings do you suggest for the HDRI, or have 'we' not gotten that far yet?
the only thing what i do for neutral photometric lights is setting the color to 4.8 - 5k...
6.5k is used for the standard photometric lights ..... which is a little bit a to cold light...now when we go in a strong sunny HDRi... the light there is more 5k.... if we use standard pohtometric light color to setup our skins then we get a tad to much warm and reddish for Hdris because of this...
neutral white is around 4.8k - 5k....
actually i dont understand why standard lightcolor in Iray is set to 6500
I think, that is the 'True white' of a sorts, at least for Iray threw Studio? For those of us that want 'Photo neutral' or whatever.
Those images are all done with the default everything. It is overall a pretty bright light so lets say it is about as bright as a sunny day. If you want some room to add photometric I would lower the percentage on the intensity. If you do that you may need to adjust tone mapping depending on how far down you turn the intensity down. It was fine with tone mapping set at 200 when the intensity was turned down to .75 and 1 3000 30x30 rectangle. I've done a test of that and another example that shows how colors influence the skin tone. Of course since the planes are between the figure and the light they are also cutting out the white light that would hit the figure and adding the colored reflected light which wouldn't be quite as bright.
i come from the advertising and photoindustry.... (i dont say anymore, "thats how it is" here
)..... we used over decades for neutral colors (photo neutral) 5k.... for Photo and Print..
5 k is horizontal daylight 5.5k vertical (sky).... photolamps do usally 4.8 - 5,5k because of this.
Andy when your talking about working on textures you need as little influence as possible color wise so that you can "see" the colors that your working with. I'm not talking about final settings but more "are there odd blotches or texture changes" that need to be dealt with before anything is final. Just as an easy example. If a character creator is piecing together a skin texture they need to see if the texture blends seamlessly, if there are any funky patches caused by cloning to get rid of seams etc. Those stand out more if there is no color going on in the image. I also think its important to be able to see what color something is before it is influenced by different lighting types. If nothing else it gives me a base line to start with color wise.
I would think that idealy the next color check would be with something that was predominated by your direct sun color. It is a color that we sort of ignore out of habit so it would have the least influence on us visualy.
The main thing is to stay away from lights that have a strong warm or cool color when your trying to get a base line. If I am working on a character setting that I expect to use in many lighting situations and I have set it all up with a very blue or green light I'm going to be influenced about what I see as "skin color" and want to make stronger adjustments in the sss reflectance tint than might really be nessisary. When I move that character to an outdoor scene there is a good chance that the skin will look too warm because of the earlier influence.
You know, it's probably just easier to set temp to 0 and use the flat white emission color.
Depends on the end goal. If your going for a very even all over light you end up with a score of lights that have to be placed just right so you don't get shadowing. Or you can have an HDRI that will do pretty much the same thing in one go.
@Yes Khory absolutly
The color for a neutral setup is 5 - 5.5k.... this is where our eyes have the "reference" for seeing the full colorspectrum as neutral as possible... That's why the standard spotlight color in Daz Iray should be set to 5k...
i think this is one of the factors which add to the reddish/non natural skin tone problems on many skin settings - people which dont know about colormanagment - start with wrong color temperatur.. and the result is... to reddish in sunlight - and strange blueish/greenish in a overcast diffuse HDRi...
as far as i know the 6500k in Daz Iray come from the standard whitepoint color on RGB monitors.... ... but does not work anymore as soon as we use HDRi light. /because we simulate reality, a way lower whitepoint)...aka sun at midday has 5k... we know this is WHITE... the difference is 1500k....
if we dont use 5k.. for setting up skins.. every HDRi would need a seperatly whitepoint adjustment...
Iray for Maya
"Also available is the first edition of vMaterials, a free set of digital material offerings verified for accuracy, control and consistency. With vMaterials, designers no longer have to spend time sourcing and creating their own materials."
Khory, I was thinking more for setting up simple Iray surfaces, and wanting them to not be over dark or bright next to other things in other scenes. Tho that bit about adding lights is good to know (especially for displays and such). That color example is impressive, I remember something about a render engine that did not tint reflected light, I don't remember what one nor dose it matter here. Good to see that is in there. I was under some odd impression a white sphere of light would illuminate every part of something exactly the same, tho that clearly is not the case (that's good) with your HDRI.
AndyGrimm, (My slow typing skills, you got it) And in sRGB that would be 1.0 red, 1.0 green, 1.0 blue, Verse the reality of no actual white. That and outside is not exactly 'white' either. Blue is reduced from direct sun by the air, and it is refracted other directions. So the color of the light depends on the angle off from the sun (and the thickness of the atmosphere in that direction). It was the sRGB white I was referring to, not noon day. As much as Iray wants to mimic reality, it's still in a computer with that color-space limitation (three colors to make everything else with), lol.
Keeping in mind, that I'm dealing with Red, green, and blue with this computer. For my use of setting up surfaces, I want to see the color of the surface not the light. And simply plugging 255r 255g 255b in the light is still (or at least was back in beta) tinted by the K setting if it was not on 6500k.
So I'm kind of itching to finish the current project, so I can look at that HDRI and my Braziers.
I'm sure your right Andy. I'm going to remember to save a preset for a 5k temp spot. But for now I have to go mix up a batch of ginger bread for cookies.
I would have thought the Iray Sun/Sky was down around the 5 - 5.5K scale becasue when I render the same image with the included low quality HDRI, the skin tone is so much more pink than then when lit with the Sun, sugesting the HDRI has more blue in the light spectrum.
Share, please? my favorite :)
@Szark .. yes.. the sunsky does simulate lightcolor based on daytime...
this is the reason why i always said - the "brutal" sun sky test at 12 midday.. (where a photographer normaly would NOT take outside portraits).. is the best test for a skin.... the resulting render is NOT a charming one - same as in reality.. but it is colorneutral to HDRis.... if red goes to much saturated there.... the skinsettings are far off.
Thank you so so much. I have 5 days off after today's very very busy hair day at the salon so I'll be able to look things over. SO I see this is just the HDRI. So what sort of light set up should I use to make the most out of it? Doesn't DAZ Studio just uses the "headlamp" when using the iRay engine but if that's good enough for what I'm looking for that's fine.
And in a way, it appears to make sense. Direct sun per surface area on the planet, vs all the blue refracted from the rest of the sky. Tho I'm not entirely sure that is correct, as total light everywhere on earth. The sun is incredibly bright direct, and the rest of the sky is rather dim in comparison. It dose not entirely add up, something is off somewhere with that Iray sun or "low quality HDRI".
(EDIT) or as AndyGrimm said, the skin settings.
the sunsky does not have a environment - reflections from environment (horizontal) is a big factor (we are not used to see faces whitout that..... what i am saying is meant for understanding how to set up a lightcolor-neutral material which react to HDRi like we expect...
But there are also many HDRis which got postwork and are sligthly off (till very strong off) from the natural whitepoint ...(the one they toke the photo)...
the very strong neutral direct light at 12 midday... is also the "hardeness" test for SSS and tm distance settings.... because of strongest (natural simulated) light - our TMC color "penetrates deeper) ..(base luminance goes up)... = more red.
OK, here is a test render using the default settings in the Render Settings. There are no added lights to the scene....
You don't really need to do anything. It will be a fairly bright colorless light that is all around the figure. The only shadowing will be the AO and there is pretty much no way to get around that with Iray. It should be a pretty good light to look for seams and to check that there is no odd blotching or strange blending. The one goal was to let you see all those little funky details clearly.
Of course. There will be plenty! But they have to rest in the fridge for 3 hours (groans) before they can be rolled out.
I often end up, particularly with interior shots, with yellowish lighting (because I shoot for ~4-4.5 k with lamps and other old-fashioned bulbs), and then in post I tweak it.
What I usually do is, in GIMP, create a second layer with white autobalanced, which is usually too blue/white for my tastes, then set opacity until the balance between that and the original image looks about right.
That green one looks like somebody arranged them on 3 million lumen lamp.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e8afb/e8afb8c110874860f795cc7f02ce8bb281b8a557" alt="smiley smiley"
Perhaps architectural shader will be good for that. It haves translucency, transparency and absorption is named "absorption".
Will you could always look at doing the adjusments in studio via the white point there. Not sure it would be any easier of course.