Loading...
> >

Star Trek Builders Unite 6: The Undiscovered Thread

1…1516182021…50

Comments

  • LycanthropeXLycanthropeX Posts: 2,287
    edited December 1969

    Robert Freise said:
    LycanthropeX said:
    One of my fav TOS episodes....

    That was a good one

    I think it shows how you can really get creative with Star Trek renders, a lot of the TOS episodes dealt with time travel and alternative dimensions. So even if you don't have a lot of sci-fi ships and props you can still do Trek renders. Heck a few TOS episodes were filmed on the set for Mayberry RFD

  • LycanthropeXLycanthropeX Posts: 2,287
    edited December 1969

    In my case, I spent so much on those damn Nazi uniforms I have been trying to figure out how to use them in as many images as possible to justify the money I spent... and so Patterns of Force came to mind lol. I really do love that episode though, one of my all time favs. But I swear I will be sticking Nazis into renders for the next 6 months to get my money out of them...

  • Ryuu@AMcCFRyuu@AMcCF Posts: 703
    edited November 2014

    rschulte said:
    LycanthropeX said:
    Redfern said:
    LycanthropeX said:
    I read the other day on the Klingon BOP. Wings up for landing, wings level for cruising, and wings down for attack

    And, if the craft loses main engines within an atmosphere, the ship tries to maintain altitude by madly flapping them! :lol:

    Sincerely,

    Bill

    thank you for that mental image Bill, thats going to crack me up every time I see a BOP from now on

    you mean quack you up. :red: Oh...

    So that explains why Sulu crashed. He didn't flap them hard enough.

    Post edited by Ryuu@AMcCF on
  • rdudarduda Posts: 579
    edited December 1969

    Name that bridge:

    01.jpg
    661 x 795 - 190K
  • LycanthropeXLycanthropeX Posts: 2,287
    edited December 1969

    Rduda said:
    Name that bridge:

    I name it Hugo, it just looks like a Hugo to me

  • shadowhawk1shadowhawk1 Posts: 2,200
    edited December 1969

    LycanthropeX said:
    Rduda said:
    Name that bridge:

    I name it Hugo, it just looks like a Hugo to me

    Looks more like a Daphne to me is it from the U.S.S. Scoobie - Doo?

  • Night-ForagerNight-Forager Posts: 128
    edited December 1969

    Rduda said:
    Name that bridge:

    I'm going to guess the USS Jenolan.
  • nightwolf1982nightwolf1982 Posts: 1,175
    edited December 1969

    Looks like jnsessions nailed it, Sydney Class USS Jenolan

  • shadowhawk1shadowhawk1 Posts: 2,200
    edited December 1969

    nightwolf1982 said:
    Looks like jnsessions nailed it, Sydney Class USS Jenolan

    AWW MAN!!! I was hoping it was the U.S.S. Scoobie Doo!

  • rdudarduda Posts: 579
    edited December 1969

    Jenolan, and Sydney class are correct!! Just got them done last night after my computer crash last week I'm back up and running, I'm sure this and the Voyager Eng room will be ready at the same time.

    Screen.jpg
    649 x 725 - 144K
  • nightwolf1982nightwolf1982 Posts: 1,175
    edited December 1969

    Don't forget to include Scotty!!

  • rdudarduda Posts: 579
    edited December 1969

    Maybe a bottle of scotch!

  • SpottedKittySpottedKitty Posts: 7,232
    edited November 2014

    A very nice Jenolen bridge.

    Has anyone come across a credible size estimate for the Sydney class? The ship model we saw on-screen had windows on the side and a conventional Constitution-type bridge deck stuck on top, but that bridge isn't the right size or shape to fit inside. I get the impression it's a fairly small ship, but still much bigger than a runabout.

    Post edited by SpottedKitty on
  • TimbalesTimbales Posts: 2,366
    edited December 1969

    SpottedKitty said:
    A very nice Jenolen bridge.

    Has anyone come across a credible size estimate for the Sydney class? The ship model we saw on-screen had windows on the side and a conventional Constitution-type bridge deck stuck on top, but that bridge isn't the right size or shape to fit inside. I get the impression it's a fairly small ship, but still much bigger than a runabout.

    this might help

    http://startrekadmiral.deviantart.com/art/Sydney-class-starboard-108742255

    http://www.deviantart.com/art/Sydney-class-rear-108742103

    it's mainly meant as a personnel transport

  • SpottedKittySpottedKitty Posts: 7,232
    edited December 1969

    OK, thanks. Looks like a sort of medium-sized ship. Anyone seen a model anywhere? I've looked at the usual suspects (Foundation3D and Trekmeshes) with no luck.

  • robkelkrobkelk Posts: 3,259
    edited December 1969

    TimG said:
    SpottedKitty said:
    A very nice Jenolen bridge.

    Has anyone come across a credible size estimate for the Sydney class? The ship model we saw on-screen had windows on the side and a conventional Constitution-type bridge deck stuck on top, but that bridge isn't the right size or shape to fit inside. I get the impression it's a fairly small ship, but still much bigger than a runabout.

    this might help

    http://startrekadmiral.deviantart.com/art/Sydney-class-starboard-108742255

    http://www.deviantart.com/art/Sydney-class-rear-108742103

    it's mainly meant as a personnel transport
    Finishing off the set:
    http://startrekadmiral.deviantart.com/art/Sydney-class-dorsal-108860135


    (And I'd be interested in getting a model of this one, too...)

  • rschulterschulte Posts: 489
    edited December 1969

    robkelk said:
    TimG said:
    SpottedKitty said:
    A very nice Jenolen bridge.

    Has anyone come across a credible size estimate for the Sydney class? The ship model we saw on-screen had windows on the side and a conventional Constitution-type bridge deck stuck on top, but that bridge isn't the right size or shape to fit inside. I get the impression it's a fairly small ship, but still much bigger than a runabout.

    this might help

    http://startrekadmiral.deviantart.com/art/Sydney-class-starboard-108742255

    http://www.deviantart.com/art/Sydney-class-rear-108742103

    it's mainly meant as a personnel transport


    Finishing off the set:
    http://startrekadmiral.deviantart.com/art/Sydney-class-dorsal-108860135

    (And I'd be interested in getting a model of this one, too...)

    Bridge commander model, *.nif format which can be converted to obj.

    http://bridgecommander.filefront.com/file/USS_Jenolan;108293

  • robkelkrobkelk Posts: 3,259
    edited December 1969

    rschulte said:
    robkelk said:
    TimG said:
    SpottedKitty said:
    A very nice Jenolen bridge.

    Has anyone come across a credible size estimate for the Sydney class? The ship model we saw on-screen had windows on the side and a conventional Constitution-type bridge deck stuck on top, but that bridge isn't the right size or shape to fit inside. I get the impression it's a fairly small ship, but still much bigger than a runabout.

    this might help

    http://startrekadmiral.deviantart.com/art/Sydney-class-starboard-108742255

    http://www.deviantart.com/art/Sydney-class-rear-108742103

    it's mainly meant as a personnel transport


    Finishing off the set:
    http://startrekadmiral.deviantart.com/art/Sydney-class-dorsal-108860135

    (And I'd be interested in getting a model of this one, too...)

    Bridge commander model, *.nif format which can be converted to obj.

    http://bridgecommander.filefront.com/file/USS_Jenolan;108293

    Alas, that presented a somewhat-amusing 404 page instead of a model.

  • rschulterschulte Posts: 489
    edited November 2014

    link removed...

    Post edited by rschulte on
  • patience55patience55 Posts: 7,006
    edited December 1969

    I believe the idea is that they want people to go via their own links from the side bar.

  • scathascatha Posts: 756
    edited December 1969

    I believe this no hotlinking trend is starting to be a real pita...

  • robkelkrobkelk Posts: 3,259
    edited December 1969

    scatha said:
    I believe this no hotlinking trend is starting to be a real pita...
    The whole point to the WWW is hotlinking. Kill that and you don't have a web any more - just a collection of sites.

    Anyway.

  • patience55patience55 Posts: 7,006
    edited November 2014

    robkelk said:
    scatha said:
    I believe this no hotlinking trend is starting to be a real pita...
    The whole point to the WWW is hotlinking. Kill that and you don't have a web any more - just a collection of sites.

    Anyway.

    I concur ... however some nidgits thought using computer bots to download stuff from sites to the point of crashing servers ... so that gets rather expensive and people had to say enough already [and apparently some laws were made]. At least that's what one website owner's concern was ... he was quite prepared to block the IP addresses for half the country IF 'one person' abused [in his eyes] his site [of gravemarkers]. His site didn't last too many years.

    Post edited by patience55 on
  • jaguarry3jaguarry3 Posts: 230
    edited December 1969

    My latest ship the USS Tucker

    Uss_Tucker.jpg
    1800 x 1400 - 281K
  • mdbruffymdbruffy Posts: 2,345
    edited December 1969

    Has anyone heard anything else about why TrekCore's screencap pages are off-line? They've been down for nearly a month now. Don't need anything at the moment, just went to check to see if they were back up yet.

  • rdudarduda Posts: 579
    edited December 1969

    TNG/NX Bridge, what do you think?

    04.jpg
    689 x 830 - 197K
    03.jpg
    689 x 830 - 221K
    02.jpg
    689 x 830 - 199K
    01.jpg
    689 x 830 - 204K
  • TimbalesTimbales Posts: 2,366
    edited December 1969

    very nice, as always

  • NV OracleNV Oracle Posts: 139
    edited December 1969

    Rduda said:
    TNG/NX Bridge, what do you think?


    I agree, it's looking good.

  • mdbruffymdbruffy Posts: 2,345
    edited December 1969

    For those that might be interested, I just checked and Trekcore's Screencap pages are back up. :-)

  • AndypAndyp Posts: 31
    edited December 1969

    Not all TNG is still down.

This discussion has been closed.