Not a fan of the new product library layout

1235716

Comments

  • KitsumoKitsumo Posts: 1,216
    edited August 2020
    Leana said:
    Sempie said:

    Not only do I not use DAZ Central - I use Poser.

    And all Poser download files vanished into thin air. Even for Poser only items. DAZ files only.

    The files are still there but for whatever reason they're labeled "Daz Studio" now...

    I suppose Daz wanted to separate files for programs like blender and C4D from files for DS, and forgot about Poser...

    Also my less-than-successful foray into the rap world

    fake album cover

    So many unsold copies...frown

    rap-collaborations-1385485291-view-1.jpg
    620 x 460 - 62K
    Post edited by Kitsumo on
  • LeanaLeana Posts: 11,821
    edited August 2020
    Noah LGP said:

    It's a good update.

    No, it's not. Downloads are incorrectly labeled and it takes way more time to find useful information than it used to.

    Noah LGP said:

    It's a download page, nobody read the description of the product.

    Actually, as this thread suggests, quite a few people do.

    Post edited by Leana on
  • namffuaknamffuak Posts: 4,176
    Noah LGP said:

    It's a good update. It's a download page, nobody read the description of the product.

     

    It was the easiest to find reference information for products no longer in the store - and the only source of information about the items contained in ad-hoc sale bundles.

  • kyoto kidkyoto kid Posts: 41,212
    kyoto kid said:
    Novica said:

    I'm also downloading all of my purchases here for later use with backed up DIM in case Daz decides to force Central on us once and for all. It's a slow and tedious process doing it manually even with a modest (58 page) library, and Daz is sending everything incredibly slowly. 

    I hear ya. My external hard drive broke (my fault, knocked it off the table) and I have been downloading all my products from the very beginning, doing it since the beginning of last month.   I have the same concerns about the future of DIM (And obviously, going to do Cloud storage too.)  It's apparent they are shoving DazCentral down our throats.

    So I'm sending my ticket to Tech Support.

    I'll likewise send a discrete ticket to Tech Support, though I'm considering one to Customer Service as well. They'll be the ones getting to deal with floods of surprise DazCentral-only returns. The whole "it was totally an accident that all this new stuff was listed for DazCentral only" line seems sus in the wake of this library redesign, complete with a download link for it that's suspiciously easy to accidentally click (basically where the product page link used to be). And of course, the new bridges they're advertising heavily are DazCentral only...

    Cloud storage is a good idea, I might back up some of my most important purchases and project files there. I wish I'd started the backup a month ago when I first got a bad feeling, because the slow downloads are killing me. I'm just finishing up page two and I'd guess my average file size has been 400-500MB. Sometimes I'll get a nice utility or script at a couple megs, but then I'll get a 2.5GB set of HDRIs or a 3.5GB set of terrain, or just some 800MB hair. With Daz serving things at less than ten MB/s on average through the site, it hurts. Plus I'm half expecting to hear from my ISP, wondering what on earth I'm doing.

    ...cloud storage means you have to be online. I am not fond of having to be online when working as it is dependent on your connection and takes up additional system resoruces as well.

    There's no reason you'd have to be, and I don't think anyone is suggesting using cloud storage as anything more than a backup for our data in case the worst happens. We all seem to appreciate at least some degree of disconnect between Studio and the internet, preferring manual installation or DIM.

    I'm not a fan of using the cloud in lieu of local storage, but I'm a big fan of using it to back select things up for subsequent retrieval. I'd never trust cloud storage in situations where you have to read/write to it constantly. In general I hate remote read/write stuff, ever since college when they disabled all local saving and forced us to read from and write directly to a university server. Unsurprisingly, a whole bunch of our major projects got corrupted in the process. But I'm happy to pay Apple a buck a month for the space to keep copies my pictures and documents (I maintain all of the data locally as well and all access is local), and $10/mo to Dropbox for everything else (uploaded on my schedule).

    Any version of Studio that starts requiring us to use DazCentral or have an always-on connection is the version I will refuse to install, ever, no matter how many attractive upgrades it brings.

    ...I have one backup drive and am looking at getting another larger one when my next cheque comes through.  I like keeping things local and am not a fan of putting my more important or critical work on someone else's server where can be hacked  Dropbox security has been breached both last year and more recently.  

  • kyoto kidkyoto kid Posts: 41,212
    Noah LGP said:

    It's a good update. It's a download page, nobody read the description of the product.

     

    ..I did, and also used the order number and purchase date.

  • Cora ReginaCora Regina Posts: 731
    edited August 2020
    Novica said:

    I'm also downloading all of my purchases here for later use with backed up DIM in case Daz decides to force Central on us once and for all. It's a slow and tedious process doing it manually even with a modest (58 page) library, and Daz is sending everything incredibly slowly. 

    I hear ya. My external hard drive broke (my fault, knocked it off the table) and I have been downloading all my products from the very beginning, doing it since the beginning of last month.   I have the same concerns about the future of DIM (And obviously, going to do Cloud storage too.)  It's apparent they are shoving DazCentral down our throats.

    So I'm sending my ticket to Tech Support.

    I'll likewise send a discrete ticket to Tech Support, though I'm considering one to Customer Service as well. They'll be the ones getting to deal with floods of surprise DazCentral-only returns. The whole "it was totally an accident that all this new stuff was listed for DazCentral only" line seems sus in the wake of this library redesign, complete with a download link for it that's suspiciously easy to accidentally click (basically where the product page link used to be). And of course, the new bridges they're advertising heavily are DazCentral only...

    Except that people who do have Daz Central installed confirmed that the files really weren't available that way either. It really was that the file association (the way the system knows which files go with which product) had failed, not part of a conspiracy.

    Cool. I still don't want that mess on my computer, I'm still mad about this completely unwarranted and deeply regressive change, and it still feels like Daz is pushing us toward something invasive that the majority neither want nor need. They replaced literally all of the useful info in our on-site product libraries with a DazCentral advertisement, on every single page. Given the timing, I don't find it surprising or unreasonable that people are feeling a bit conspiratorial and bracing for the worst.

     

    kyoto kid said:
    kyoto kid said:
    Novica said:

    I'm also downloading all of my purchases here for later use with backed up DIM in case Daz decides to force Central on us once and for all. It's a slow and tedious process doing it manually even with a modest (58 page) library, and Daz is sending everything incredibly slowly. 

    I hear ya. My external hard drive broke (my fault, knocked it off the table) and I have been downloading all my products from the very beginning, doing it since the beginning of last month.   I have the same concerns about the future of DIM (And obviously, going to do Cloud storage too.)  It's apparent they are shoving DazCentral down our throats.

    So I'm sending my ticket to Tech Support.

    I'll likewise send a discrete ticket to Tech Support, though I'm considering one to Customer Service as well. They'll be the ones getting to deal with floods of surprise DazCentral-only returns. The whole "it was totally an accident that all this new stuff was listed for DazCentral only" line seems sus in the wake of this library redesign, complete with a download link for it that's suspiciously easy to accidentally click (basically where the product page link used to be). And of course, the new bridges they're advertising heavily are DazCentral only...

    Cloud storage is a good idea, I might back up some of my most important purchases and project files there. I wish I'd started the backup a month ago when I first got a bad feeling, because the slow downloads are killing me. I'm just finishing up page two and I'd guess my average file size has been 400-500MB. Sometimes I'll get a nice utility or script at a couple megs, but then I'll get a 2.5GB set of HDRIs or a 3.5GB set of terrain, or just some 800MB hair. With Daz serving things at less than ten MB/s on average through the site, it hurts. Plus I'm half expecting to hear from my ISP, wondering what on earth I'm doing.

    ...cloud storage means you have to be online. I am not fond of having to be online when working as it is dependent on your connection and takes up additional system resoruces as well.

    There's no reason you'd have to be, and I don't think anyone is suggesting using cloud storage as anything more than a backup for our data in case the worst happens. We all seem to appreciate at least some degree of disconnect between Studio and the internet, preferring manual installation or DIM.

    I'm not a fan of using the cloud in lieu of local storage, but I'm a big fan of using it to back select things up for subsequent retrieval. I'd never trust cloud storage in situations where you have to read/write to it constantly. In general I hate remote read/write stuff, ever since college when they disabled all local saving and forced us to read from and write directly to a university server. Unsurprisingly, a whole bunch of our major projects got corrupted in the process. But I'm happy to pay Apple a buck a month for the space to keep copies my pictures and documents (I maintain all of the data locally as well and all access is local), and $10/mo to Dropbox for everything else (uploaded on my schedule).

    Any version of Studio that starts requiring us to use DazCentral or have an always-on connection is the version I will refuse to install, ever, no matter how many attractive upgrades it brings.

    ...I have one backup drive and am looking at getting another larger one when my next cheque comes through.  I like keeping things local and am not a fan of putting my more important or critical work on someone else's server where can be hacked  Dropbox security has been breached both last year and more recently.  

    I don't upload anything I would consider to be "secure" information, nor would ever recommend someone to do so. If someone hacks into my Dropbox, they won't find passwords or banking info, just the mother lode of gluten free recipes, crochet patterns, and bad fanfiction, plus the occasional scene file that they won't be able to use properly. Maybe they'll see a picture or two of my elf's bits, but that's kinda what I'm making those for in the first place. ;)

    I understand being concerned about digital security, and I am. I will always choose local storage first and routinely buy the largest devices I can so that I'm able to store everything. I have a storage shelf filled with nothing but hard drives and anything that I would mind someone else seeing never touches iCloud or Dropbox. That doesn't mean I won't consider a digital backup for certain pieces of non-sensitive information. Our art isn't what hackers are looking for. YMMV, of course, but I'm personally not going to lose sleep over someone getting a glimpse of my 20-something character's "anatomical elements," or my recipe for black bean brownies.

    The limoncello bundt cake recipe, of course, is another matter entirely.

     

    Noah LGP said:

    It's a good update. It's a download page, nobody read the description of the product.

    I read those descriptions and checked purchase information all the time. Today I was trying to figure out when I bought the OceanQueen Megabundle and my only recourse, short of looking at every single order until I found it (because we can't search our order history here), was to hunt down the purchase confirmation email from more than four years ago. A couple days back I would have been able to find out in about ten seconds by looking at the info in my product library, but Daz decided it was critical that I no longer be able to do that.

    Yesterday I had to submit a tech support ticket and what's already a tedious process took even longer because the purchase information was gone. I had to go reference the order itself; fortunately it was relatively recent and I only had to look through four orders to find it instead of the 345 that OceanQueen would have required (which is how many orders back that purchase was out of 459 total).

    Post edited by Cora Regina on
  • CybersoxCybersox Posts: 9,082
    edited August 2020
    Noah LGP said:

    It's a good update. It's a download page, nobody read the description of the product.

     

    Apparently you haven't bothered to read all the coments above that specifically state exactly the opposite.  Those of us with large collections depended on that page now that the readmes to so many older products have disappeared from the wiki (or were never put there in the first place, as is true of so much of the RDNA products), and removing the reference to the purchase number is an even bigger issue. 

    Post edited by Cybersox on
  • SpottedKittySpottedKitty Posts: 7,232
    DAZ_Rawb said:

    No promises, but I've brought some of your concerns to the right people and they are considering some updates. It will have to go through the standard discuss/design/implement routine so it will take some time if they do like the suggested updates but the right people are aware.

    Note that we aren't talking "updates", we're talking "put the old working layout back because this one is useless".

    I've put in my own support ticket. I'll be waiting for the response.

  • souji_monarusouji_monaru Posts: 51
    edited August 2020

    Hopefully we won't have to make a petition for this type of thing, eh? Some aesthetic changes are fine, but functionality isn't negotiable in this case. That functionality was taken away, and all we're left with is something theoretically organized but pointless since it doesn't function properly.

    Post edited by souji_monaru on
  • Yeah, I just submitted a ticket too.  Was beginning to worry.  I had to click on the submit button 6 times before it would go through.  The product library is now a mess and pretty much useless.  Hopefully readers of this thread will continue to submit ticklets about the missing product information issue.

  • CybersoxCybersox Posts: 9,082
    DAZ_Rawb said:

    No promises, but I've brought some of your concerns to the right people and they are considering some updates. It will have to go through the standard discuss/design/implement routine so it will take some time if they do like the suggested updates but the right people are aware.

    Note that we aren't talking "updates", we're talking "put the old working layout back because this one is useless".

    Exactly.  And the issue is even more infuriatiing because all that data was replaced by an AD that repeats on every single page.  I haven't loaded DAZ Central yet because I already know, from many people who've been unfortunate enough to do so, that it won't currently support my runtime structure, but I'd been holding an open mind towards it were they able to get it working properly.  However, if I have to keeping staring at a stupid ad for it every time I go to my product library and see it sitting there where USEFUL information once was, that open mind goes out the window and the odds are that I will NEVER try it out of pure and simple spite.       

  • firewardenfirewarden Posts: 1,484

    I turned in a ticket because I actually needed info on some products today and I can only retrieve the stupid DazCentral (don't want it and won't use it) advert. Not a happy camper. Mentioned DazCentral also. I like DIM, although I know some folks like manual. We should be able to use whatever method we want. I got a reply that my feedback would be passed along to the team.

  • I have received an answer to my ticket; they have passed the feedback along, but there are no promises that there will be an update made.

    IMHO, it sounds like a PFO, but we can hope that they might reconsider.

  • zombietaggerungzombietaggerung Posts: 3,756
    edited August 2020

    I have received an answer to my ticket; they have passed the feedback along, but there are no promises that there will be an update made.

    IMHO, it sounds like a PFO, but we can hope that they might reconsider.

    Yeah I got that same response. It very much sounds like a brush off to me as well. I'm strongly beginning to think that my days of spending here are done. Corporations will only change when it starts to affect profits. And I know i'm only one person, but still.

    Peace out.

    Post edited by zombietaggerung on
  • xyer0xyer0 Posts: 6,033

    Perhaps Daz sees the single-frame market as less desirable than game gear, and they've decided to put us in our place. Duly noted.

  • NathNath Posts: 2,848
    edited August 2020

    Same answer for me as well.

    I'm in the middle of reorganising and updatng my local storage of 3d files, so yeah, I have also recently needed the information that was still there a few days ago, and almost certainly will need again. Maybe I should start keeping my order overview in a local copy too (probably should have done so from the start, but hey), in case that suddenly goes away as well.

    If this is the way forward, well... I'm just making sure that I have the install files for the current version of Studio safely on a harddisk or two, lest a future version is suddenly Central only. I also may not be spending as much.

    Post edited by Nath on
  • Ron KnightsRon Knights Posts: 1,805

    I've never seen the need to gather screenshots or save copies of my orders. The biggest thing I've done is to organize all my originals under categories (Genesis 8 Male, Genesis 8 Female, etc.) That way I will always know what is what!

  • CybersoxCybersox Posts: 9,082
    xyer0 said:

    Perhaps Daz sees the single-frame market as less desirable than game gear, and they've decided to put us in our place. Duly noted.

    Which is ironic, as people who are into games and animation are more likely going to be even MORE concerned with having access to the info that they've deleted, because that's a business, as well as being far more likely to use unconventional runtime schemes that DAZ Central can't handle.  Beyond that, this will be what... DAZ's third or fourth time to try to break into a different market since the introduction of DS 4.0, and how well have any of those attempts gone? 

  • KeryaKerya Posts: 10,943

    I have received an answer to my ticket; they have passed the feedback along, but there are no promises that there will be an update made.

    IMHO, it sounds like a PFO, but we can hope that they might reconsider.

     

    Me too ...

  • I put in for a refund for my entire order of old products bought tonight - not one single item appeared in my dim and from the looks of it the only options being offered to download is central and or manual zip both which don't use actually one is zip only though on their pages dim is listed

  • 3Diva3Diva Posts: 11,729

    I put in for a refund for my entire order of old products bought tonight - not one single item appeared in my dim and from the looks of it the only options being offered to download is central and or manual zip both which don't use actually one is zip only though on their pages dim is listed

    That's weird, the large purchase of older items I made a few hours ago are all showing up in DIM.

  • 3Diva said:

    I put in for a refund for my entire order of old products bought tonight - not one single item appeared in my dim and from the looks of it the only options being offered to download is central and or manual zip both which don't use actually one is zip only though on their pages dim is listed

    That's weird, the large purchase of older items I made a few hours ago are all showing up in DIM.

    tried several times without any luck, not been having a lot of luck lately with purchases had a lot of stuff not showing up in right locations or missiing files or other problems these were new releases too but tonight bought bunch of pretty old I think content well other add on content poses I didn't get are from the Michael/Vicky 4 days

    https://www.daz3d.com/the-village-blacksmith

     

    https://www.daz3d.com/old-forge

     

    https://www.daz3d.com/old-west-saloon

     

    https://www.daz3d.com/the-old-west-saloon-interior

     

    https://www.daz3d.com/old-west-undertakers-interior

     

    https://www.daz3d.com/old-west-mercantile-interior

     

    https://www.daz3d.com/old-west-sheriffs-office-interior

  • LeanaLeana Posts: 11,821

    I put in for a refund for my entire order of old products bought tonight - not one single item appeared in my dim and from the looks of it the only options being offered to download is central and or manual zip both which don't use actually one is zip only though on their pages dim is listed

    DIM uses the same files and servers as DazCentral and manual install, so they should be listed. It might be that you have a filter set in DIM which prevents them from appearing though...

    The products you linked to all list "Daz Studio" not "Daz Studio 4.12" on the product page, so if you only have "DS 4.5+" selected in DIM filters they probably won't appear, for example.

  • cherpenbeckcherpenbeck Posts: 1,413

    Just submitted my complaint. If DAZ doesn't change that information back, my current store credits will be the last money I spent on DAZ content. That's not a threat, that's a statement.

  • TaozTaoz Posts: 9,973
    edited August 2020
    3Diva said:
    Gordig said:

    I'm not defending the change, but what are some of you doing with your product library that this is such a problem? I almost never look at mine.

    I know quite a few people who use Daz3D content for commercial purposes and so need to be able to look up what products were purchased, when, and how much they spent on it, etc, for billing clients or for taxes, etc. People also find issues with products and need to be able to find out when exactly they ordered it to see if they are still within the one-month return policy period.

    The actual purchase price for each item after discounts etc. can not be found on the order pages, the only way to find it is in the email receipt.  See attached screenshot.

    daz_actual_prices.png
    1040 x 2884 - 243K
    Post edited by Taoz on
  • glaseyeglaseye Posts: 1,312
    Taoz said:

    The actual purchase price for each item after discounts etc. can not be found on the order pages, the only way to find it is in the email receipt.  See attached screenshot.

    IIRC correctly, one could find the order nr. in the product library - not anymore so more difficult to find the order page....

  • This is a terrible, terrible change!!

  • CybersoxCybersox Posts: 9,082
    jd641 said:
    So stupid. I don't know why Daz insists on unnecessary changes

    This may piss off some people, but most "designers", as in people who redo GUI for websites and apps, are comlete idiots and have no idea what the base customers want in terms of website/app useability.

    Clearly this is more of a corporate push to get DC to more people and they're going to take away anything else that would grab attention. But they're so out of touch with DS users and how we depend on the information in our libraries that they don't consider the information they removed to be vital.

    I've had so many of my programs/apps/sites ruined by "redesigns" that it's pathetic. One of my favorite gaming hubs is Steam. It was fast, efficient and the GUI worked flawlessly. Then they revamped it to look like some stupid mobile game with large fonts, even larger images and the removal of some of the best features. Now I hate Steams GUI with a passion.

    So completely dead on.  My company has an extensive web presence, with both online catalogs and a streaming service under several different brand names, so we get a lot of designers and marketing people applying, and the majority of applicants seem to be able to do little more than parrot whatever the current hot buzzwords are.  Even with the ones that we do hire, it's a constant battle to keep them from "improving" things without causing problems for other parts of the company... though we've thankfully never had the kind of problems that DAZ seems to have to to three times a week.  The one consistant thing that I've seen across almost every internet venue that I go to is that there has rarely been a site upgrade that acually improved the functionality of the website, and the vast majority make it much harder.  I used to be able to go to my airline website and do everything I needed to do to book a reservation or check my mileage from the front page.  Not anymore, and half of the time I have to re-verify who I am because it can't seem to grasp that I use three computers in three locations.  The same is true of my bank.  Amazon Prime's home video section can't even show you a list of products by price because some idiot thought it was a good idea to mix rentals and purchase items into a single category, and looking up a book by author or an electronics item by specs is a nightmare because they let other authors and companies buy priority places in the search results, even if they're clearly not what was searched for.  And then there's Audible, which is even worse...  Gah... 

  • TaozTaoz Posts: 9,973
    edited August 2020
    glaseye said:
    Taoz said:

    The actual purchase price for each item after discounts etc. can not be found on the order pages, the only way to find it is in the email receipt.  See attached screenshot.

    IIRC correctly, one could find the order nr. in the product library - not anymore so more difficult to find the order page....

    Well if it doesn't get back you can easily find product, order number, SKU and other data with this one:

    http://taosoft.dk/software/pm-daz/

    Post edited by Taoz on
  • CybersoxCybersox Posts: 9,082

    I also submitted a ticket about this, and included the suggestion that, if the issue could not be fixed, that an alternate and equivalent method of providing the removed information be made available, and requested an Excel compatible document containing all of the removed info for all of the 24K+ items currently in my Product Library.     

Sign In or Register to comment.